On Monday I received spam, as many periodically do, from the World Multi-Conference on Systemics, Cybernetics and Informatics, WMSCI '09. Their peer review process having been previously demonstrated by Stribling et al. to be susceptible to random paper generation, they have a new strategy:
Submitted papers or extended abstracts will have three kinds of reviews: double-blind (by at least three reviewers), non-blind, and participative peer-to-peer reviews.(Emphasis mine.) The conference web site further describes the peer-to-peer review process as
Informal, nonlinear, systemically interactive methods, for the achievement of what is called bottom-up quality[.]
This is great news; as a sometime peer-to-peer researcher myself, I'm eager to see nonlinear peer-to-peer reviewing technology adopted.
I understand that as future work WMSCI is developing an oblivious algorithm for ad-hoc low-power reviewing.